SPI Fellows’ Corner: PinkerÔÇÖs Platform, and Shermer on the Hill

Earlier this week, the LA Times reported that Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg named Fellow Steven PinkerÔÇÖs The Better Angels of Our Nature: Why Violence Has Declined as his book clubÔÇÖs second pick of the year. Up to 270,000 members will use the group ÔÇ£A Year of BooksÔÇØ to read and discuss a new volume every two weeks in 2015.

PinkerÔÇÖs Better Angels poses the argument that, in terms of our human history, violence is currently on the decline around the world. As Zuckerberg explained: “Recent events might make it seem like violence and terrorism are more common than ever, so it’s worth understanding that all violenceÔÇöeven terrorismÔÇöis actually decreasing over time. If we understand how we are achieving this, we can continue our path towards peace.”

The Facebook CEO went on to comment that in spite of its hefty 800-page volume, he chose PinkerÔÇÖs book because several trusted sources told him it was the best they had ever read. Based on the stats of the clubÔÇÖs first pick, hundreds of Page comments are expected in the dialogue following the one-month read. Regardless, ZuckerbergÔÇÖs selection may yield additional purchases of PinkerÔÇÖs book in the tens of thousands, which means an ever-broader reach for a renowned proponent of secular values.

On Wednesday, Fellow Michael Shermer held the floor at the Cato Institute when he gave a talk on The Moral Arc of humanity, and signed copies of his latest book by the same name. On Wednesday afternoon and Thursday morning, he embarked on a greater challenge: joining Edwina Rogers in direct meetings with members of the FullSizeRenderHouse to discuss how his findings relate to the current state of American politics.

Among the Representatives with which SPI made a connection were Congressman McCaul, Congressman Swalwell, Congresswoman Lofgren, Congressman Grayson, Congressman Rohrabacher, and Ranking Member Eddie Bernice Johnson.  All are members of the Science Committee who were willing to brainstorm with Shermer on how to increase the influence of scientific knowledge on U.S. policy. Partnership with these offices means they will be able to act as conduits of reason-oriented legislation.




Are the Churchly More Charitable?

It is a widely held truism that more religious Americans tend to be more charitable. ┬áThe thesis that those who are closest to the creator are the oneÔÇÖs most┬áwilling to help out their fellow man, woman and child has become a primary┬ájustification for the continuation of religion as a societally positive force.

The thesis is even believed by many if not most atheists, to the extent that secularist  have attempted to mount charitable efforts to show that nonbelievers are charitable too.

There is a problem with the belief that believers are especially altruistic financially and otherwise. It is not based on sound science, and may not be true.

In a paper in The Social Science Journal titled “Does Religion Foster Generosity”, Roy Sablosky puts a brace of technical torpedoes into the belief that theists are more generous. He┬áobserves that no one really knows the relative rates of charitable giving in┬átheists and atheists because no one is actually measuring levels of┬ácontributing. What we have been relying upon is self-reporting of contributions via mass surveys. That is inherently unreliable. ┬áBecause theists are prone to think
they should be charitable to be in accord with the demands of their supernatural deity and scriptures, they may be overreporting their generosity. There are also potential problems with survey selection bias. Very importantly, experimental studies conducted over the years have failed to observe that theists are any more giving than nontheists.

In view of the lack of evidence that those who attend church are more charitable, it is incumbent on researchers to bring to bear the most methodically sound measures to determine relative levels of charitability.




All Eyes on Washington – Will The GOP Prove They Can Govern?

US Congress – Secular Policy Institute staff are busy attending briefings on the Republican’s plans for the new 114th Congress that kicked off last Tuesday amidst snowfall. Republicans lost Congressional dominance in 2007 and have waited eight years for that day. ┬áSenate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell is wasting no time and pushing ahead with the Keystone pipeline (with a veto threat) and adjustments to the Affordable Care Act (such as the roll backs in medical device tax and the individual mandate). ┬áBy all accounts, the Republicans begin the year with a commanding majority so many advocacy groups are trying to reposition their access and goals for this Congress. ┬áSenate Democratic Leader Harry Reid held meetings at home Tuesday with his Senate Leaders as he is recovering from an exercise accident.
In the House, Speaker Boehner survived a challenge from the conservatives as two dozen members of the Republican Party did not vote for his leader position. ┬áNext week, House Republicans will try to curtail Obama’s immigration executive action by limiting funding in the Department of Homeland Security appropriation’s bill. ┬áFunding for DHS runs┬áuntil February 27.┬á┬áObama will surely veto but runs a risk of shutting down Homeland Security. The House Republicans also plan to address the US policy on Iran. ┬áThis week President Obama and Congressional leaders met on Tuesday to find areas of agreement like trade and tax reform.
White House -┬áOn January 20th┬áPresident Obama will deliver his State of the Union. ┬áCurrently the White House is dribbling out proposals that will be unveiled that day. ┬áLast week the President conducted a three-state tour to highlight his initiatives. ┬áWednesday was the economic and jobs recovery speech in Detroit. ┬áThursday was a new affordable housing plan that was highlighted in a speech at Central High School in Phoenix and then the final stop in Knoxville addressed college affordability. ┬áWe should expect executive action and not legislation where possible in the State of the Union proposals. ┬áThis week, the President hosted Congressional leaders on Tuesday and then traveled to Atlanta for a briefing on the Ebola crisis at the CDC. ┬áWednesday he was in Tampa for a briefing at US Central Command as the military begins a more aggressive assault on Islamic State in Iraq and Syria. ┬áThe Secular Policy Institute has secured a Fellow that is a leading expert on the Islamic State – Aymenn Jawad Al-Tamimi, Ph.D. ┬áHe advises numerous governments on the intricacies and complexities undergirding the rise and operation of the Islamic State.



SPI Fellows’ Corner: Michael Shermer in D.C., Dawkins on Paris

SPI Fellows’ Corner

Michael Shermer in D.C., Dawkins on Paris

Next Wednesday, January 21st, Fellow Michael Shermer, advisor to the American Council on Science and Health, founder of The Skeptics Society and Editor in Chief of its magazine Skeptic, will return to the Cato Institute as a guest speaker.  He will discuss and sign copies of his latest book, The Moral Arc: How Science and Reason Lead Humanity toward Truth, Justice, and Freedom.  On Thursday morning, Shermer will join SPI CEO Edwina Rogers at the House of Representatives to meet with select members of the Science and Technology committee about the direction of secular policy in the United States.

The event comes as part of a national book tour, just after a stop in New York.  Shermer may still have room in his schedule for an additional signing on Wednesdayevening.  If your local organization is interested in hosting a small talk, please contact madeline@secularpolicyinstitute.net.

Last week, in the wake of the Charlie Hebdo attack, Fellow Richard Dawkins made a splash in the press when he voiced his opinion that ÔÇ£religions are NOT equally violentÔÇØ.┬á Although the comment was a response to discussion on his Twitter page, he received backlash from major news publications and from Al-Jazeera.┬á However,┬áThe Huffington Post┬ácited a non-discriminatory statement by Dawkins after the similar Peshawar tragedy in December, when he┬áhad asked his 1 million followers to consider ÔÇ£what else but faith is CAPABLE of making people do such evil?ÔÇØ┬á His sentiment seems to condemn all organized groups with an extreme, but non-rational, motivation for brutality.




Governments Turn Up the Heat on Atheists

blasphemy1216A new report from the International Humanist and Ethical Union shows that even as religious belief is in global decline, a number of governments are stepping up attempts to portray secularists and atheists in a negative and often dangerous light. The report cites 13 Muslim states where apostasy and blasphemy are capital offenses; in Russia, public expression of atheist views can be treated as a criminal blasphemous offense. The trend is even seen in some western countries, like Britain, whose government has recently dropped atheism and humanism from religious studies in state schools.

Learn more about the report at reuters.comarrow2




Jewish Identity is Shifting as Jews Dismiss Religion

jewishidentity1216In the last fifty years, the Jewish population across America has changed drastically. With a third of millennial Jews identifying themselves as non-religious, and the growing numbers of inter-faith marriages – which often lead to a downplayed role of religion – the number of religious and practicing people of Jewish descent are in decline. While some Humanist Jewish groups have begun to spring up across the country, it remains to be seen what the effects of the secular Jewish culture on the population as a whole.

Read more at oregonlive.comarrow2




Atheist Group Sues Over Prayer Vigil

ocala1216An atheist group recently sued Ocala, Florida in response to an officially sponsored community-wide prayer vigil. In this interview from Fox News, watch mayor Kent Guinn explain the case and the event that started it all, which he refers to as a “prayer rally for all religions.” The group bringing the legal challenge argues that the city is showing preference to one religion and violating constitutional rights in doing so.

See the interview at foxnews.com arrow2




The Levitation University and Academic Credibility

Patrik Lindenfors, 2014

3525_2This October a very odd dissertation took place at Malm├ University in Sweden. The doctoral thesis, titled Unity Pervades All Activity as Water Every Wave, spoke to the teachings and philosophy of Maharishi Mahesh Yogi. You may recognize his name as the guru who became famous the 1960s. He toured in a Rolls Royce, claimed he could teach followers to levitate, and entranced the Beatles and other celebrities.

Research into the allure of New Age philosophies is legitimate and important. The strange feature of the dissertation was the panel chosen to review it. Every doctoral thesis must be presented to knowledgeable academics, who guide the research, serve as the audience for the final presentation when it is completed. If they accept the thesis, the student graduates. If they reject it, the student is sentenced to another year or two of labor, and they sometimes quit instead of facing it. In this case, the facultyÔÇÖs chosen opponent was Sue Brown, Associate Professor of Maharishi Vedic Science at the Maharishi University of Management (MUM), based in Iowa.

Teaching Students to Levitate Since 1973

Sorry, but assistant professor of what from where?

The MUM ÔÇ£UniversityÔÇØ has been the subject of continual criticism for fraudulent research, claims to teach New Age powers, and deifying its founder, the Maharishi Mahesh Yogi.

This is the university from which, according to her biography, Dr. Brown earned a MasterÔÇÖs in Higher Education Administration, and then a PhD with the delightful title, “Unity and Diversity in Maharishi Vedic Science, Higher States of Consciousness, and an Evaluative Study of Undergraduate Student Development”. (Sadly, this thesis is not available on the Internet.)
Thus it seems that instead of inviting a nonpartisan expert to the final seat in the panel, the facultyÔÇÖs chose one of the MaharishiÔÇÖs devoted adherents. Asking Sue Brown to scientifically evaluate research on her Guru is the antithesis of how a thesis should be judged. When charlatans try to associate themselves with science, it is maddening , but at least it proves the strong foothold that science has gained in the world. Unfortunately, by offering this panel position to a New Age advocate, Malm├ University undercut science.

Is Sue Brown even a scientist? Her area of specialty, Maharishi Vedic Science, is not a scientific subject. It claims that “modern physics has concluded that underlying the diversity of matter is a non-material field whose self-interactions generate time, space and observable forces and particles. Both approaches identify a non-material field that underlies observable change.” With such poetic language, those who donÔÇÖt understand the complexities of physics (and who does?) can be massaged into the false belief that there is proof and wide scientific support for a spirit world.

Educational Progress: To Sit in Class, You Must be Conscious

According to the MUM website, their education is ÔÇ£Consciousness-BasedÔÇØ. Though this sounds superficially reassuring ÔÇô itÔÇÖs hard to envision unconscious education ÔÇô itÔÇÖs not quite what it sounds like. Here are some quotes from the description:

The advanced TM-Sidhi® program, including Yogic Flying®, accelerates the benefits of the Transcendental Meditation technique, especially when practiced in groups, as we do here.

[…]

Faculty at MUM use special techniques that reflect fundamental laws of learning.

These include Unified field charts These wall charts map the entire discipline and all its branches, showing the relationships among all of them. They show how the discipline youre studying emerges from the underlying field of pure consciousness, pure intelligence. And they show how you experience this underlying field directly, deep within yourself, through your Transcendental Meditation practice.

Yogic Flying®? Here is the description, again from the web-page:

Yogic Flying┬«ÔǪ leads to the body lifting in short hops from the ground. Students describe the experience of this technique as one of happiness, energy, bliss, and inner freedom, with these qualities carrying over into their daily life.

Below you can view a National Geographic special on Yogic Flying, where a “professor of physics” at MUM explains how NewtonÔÇÖs law of gravity is several hundred years ÔÇ£out of dateÔÇØ. He also explains “The Maharishi Effect”, saying “The real purpose of flying, especially in groups, is to create world peace. To put an end to this tragic legacy of violence and crime and terrorism and war.”

Levitating, Crime Fighting: ItÔÇÖs a Guru Thing

Abusing the word ÔÇ£scienceÔÇØ to further their claims ÔÇô not to mention tuition fees ÔÇô MUM has been remarkable brash. On their website, they further boast that the Maharishi-effect is real and scientifically measurable:

Scientists estimated that… a group with size equal to the square root of 1% of a population would have a measurable influence on the quality of life of that population. For example, a group of 200 practicing the TM-Sidhi program together in a city of four million (100 x 200 x 200) would be sufficient to produce a measurable influence on the whole cityÔǪ

The first statistical analysis of the effects was published in 1987. These showed a decrease of about 11% in violent crimes in Washington, D.C., in total crimes in Metro Manila, and in total crimes in the Union Territory of Delhi This was put to the test under the careful scrutiny of a distinguished review board in 1993 in Washington, D.C. The maximum decrease in violent crimes was 23.3%. The statistical probability that this result could reflect chance variation in crime levels was less than 2 in 1 billion (p < .000000002).

In other words, ÔÇÿCrime rates dropped ÔÇô therefore we did itÔÇÖ. It must be nice to live with that kind of logic. The possibilities are endless to claim credit for so many things. ItÔÇÖs a shame that in doing so, they worsen the lives (and pocketbooks) of the gullible, and crowd out problem solving methods that actually work.

So what happened to the PhD student with the levitation believer on his panel? The dissertation went ahead, his thesis passed, and he graduated. The story has, however, been covered in national media and caused enough embarrassment for Malm├ University, a respected institution, that they are now investigating exactly how assistant professor Brown came to be appointed faculty opponent. Universities live or die based on their academic reputations. LetÔÇÖs hope that this mistake wonÔÇÖt be repeated.




Secular Policy Institute Attends Conference in Oman

spilogo129Edwina Rogers, CEO of Secular Policy Institute, has recently returned from a conference in Muscat, Oman, where General David Petraeus was the keynote speaker. In addition to making connections and receiving advice from experts in various fields, three new fellows agreed to join forces with the Secular Policy Institute:

Professor Dr. Amaris Baram is a scholar of Middle Eastern History at the University of Haifa. A secular Jew living in Israel, he is an adviser to many governments.

Professor Dr. Aymenn Jawad Al-Tamimi is an expert on the Middle East, Islam and terrorism from Oxford University.  He is a leading world expert on the Islamic State.  He is a Secular Arab from the UK and Iraq and advises numerous governments.

Professor Dr. Sarbagh Salih┬áis a secular female┬áKurdish scientist living in the Kurdish Region of Iraq and was previously a scientist for the US Department of Agriculture┬áwith an expertise┬áin biodiversity and plant life. ┬áShe is┬áwith the American University of Iraq and also has her own foundation – the Kurdish Botanical Foundation. Her husband, Dr. Batham Ahmed Salih, is the former Prime Minister of the Kurdistan Regional Government and Deputy PM for Iraq as well as┬áthe founder of the American University of┬áIraq.

 




Lawsuits Argue “under God” in Pledge of Allegiance

pledge129Lawsuits┬áfor and against using the phrase “under God” in the Pledge of Allegiance are being heard in New Jersey as one family claims the practice discriminates against students with non-religious beliefs, and another student argues that she has the right to recognize that her rights as an American come from God.

Learn more in this video from foxnews.comarrow2